The Wrong One Bites the Dust

4-17-12
Yikes! There I was spending Easter with family believing the world just might survive without my careful and close observation, only to return and find the world had indeed turned upside down.

What happened to Rick Santorum? Why in the world did he quit now ... before NY, PA, TX and CA?

Seriously?!?! He was the only one close to Romney and the only one to keep him from hitting that magic 1100+ number. If those morons at GOP-E central think for a minute that most of Santorum's supporters will flock to old GREENrich they are sadly mistaken! Of course I can only speak for myself, but I'll not be switching to anyone else. Enough!

Santorum was NOT the one to drop out. Old selfish, egotistical Newt and that crazy uncle from the attic Ron Paul are the ones who should have dropped out ... a couple of months ago actually.

Every time I read anything about this so-called election I get those déjà vu chills up and down my spine. Far too much of the rhetoric, the actions and the manufactured polls are comparable to the 2008 election and should scare the bejabbers out of everyone.

After quick perusals of my favorite sites I find nothing about the removal of that ineligible usurper from the ballot. What that tells me is that the GOP-E are lining up once again to ensure the illegal, ineligible, America hating usurper "wins" the phony "election" so he can become king of America for life. Please excuse me now as I am about to be very, very sick.

SoD PANETTA TELLS CONGRESS -- F**K YOU!

Senator:  But before we do this you would seek permission of the international “authorities”…

Traitor:  If we’re working with an international coalition and we’re working with NATO we would wanna be able to get appropriate permissions in order to be able to do that that’s, that’s something that all of these countries would wanna have so some kind of legal basis on which to act.

Senator:  What legal basis are you looking for?  What entity?

Traitor:  Well, obviously, if NATO made the decision to go in that would be one. If we developed an international coalition beyond NATO then obviously some kind of UN security resolution would….

Senator:  So you’re saying NATO would give you a legal basis and an ad hoc coalition of nations would provide a legal basis?

Traitor:  If we, I,if, if we were able to put together a coalition and were able to move together then obviously we would seek whatever legal basis we would need in  order to make that justified.   We can’t just pull them all together in a combat operation w/out getting the legal basis on which to act.

Senator:  Who are you asking for the legal basis from?

Traitor:  If it’s a … obviously if the UN passed a security resolution as it did in Libya we would do that.  If NATO came together as we did in Bosnia we would rely on that.  So, we have options here if we want to build the kind of international approach to dealing with the situation.

Senator:  I’m all for having international support, but I, I’m really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a LEGAL basis for the US MILITARY to be deployed in combat. 
I don’t believe it’s close to being correct.  They provide NO legal authority. 
The only legal authority that’s required to
deploy the US military is the congress
and the president and the constitution.

Traitor:  Let me just for the record be clear again, senator, so there’s no misunderstanding…
when it comes to the national defense of this country potus has the authority under the Constitution  to act to defend this country, and we will.  When it comes to an operation where we are trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in and operate as we did in Libya or Bosnia for that matter Afghanistan we wanna do it with permissions either by NATO or the international community.

Watch the entire exchange here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zNwOeyuG84&feature=colike

Well Senator, I’m not quite sure why you are baffled.  You and your treasonous cohorts have sat back and allowed the ineligible treasonous usurper to do whatever he damn well pleased for three years now.  Ye reap what you sow.  Thanks for nothing!

In essence Panetta sais: We will go to Syria and bomb them into submission if we want to and we don't need anything from the Congress to do so. We will "go in and operate as we did in Libya or Bosnia for that matter Afghanistan..."

Action against Afghanistan had the written approval of Congress in the form of the Authorization for Use of Military Force, Public Law 107-40 [S. J. RES. 23] you ignorant moron!
535 member in both Houses of Congress voted on Afghanistan.  There was ONE [1] NAY vote and 12 who chose not to vote at all. 

Oh how I loathe this regime!!!

This public law, 107-40 [S. J. RES. 23], was passed by Congress on September 14, 2001 and signed by President George W. Bush on September 18, 2001. The law authorized U.S. armed forces to use "all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001".

http://news.findlaw.com/wp/docs/terrorism/sjres23.es.html

Bottom of FormHhm

POND SCUM and the REGIME

Alan Caruba has written a very good article which is posted over at Canada Free Press titled Lower Than Pond Scum

The article was based upon yet another speech by Dunham-Soetoro-Obama-Soebarkah-X detailing his brilliance in regards to “clean energy” and touting the newest pack of lies he is spreading to the public stating his regime is “…making investments in the development of gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel that’s actually made from a plant-like substance known as lgae … Believe it or not, we could replace up to 17% of the oil we important for transportation with this fuel that we can grow right here in America.”

Mr. Caruba also reminded us of what the Regime’s future Energy Secretary, Dr. Steven Chu, famously said in a 2008 Wall Street Journal interview: “Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels of Europe.”

Of course Chu and aka Obama left out the fact that they want to do this by further bankrupting America by shoving $14 million into this “investment” of algae – otherwise known as pond scum. It was on this point Mr. Caruba inspired this blog post by informing us that –
“algae is scum. It has no roots, stems, or leaves. It is scum.”

PERFECT! I yelled at the silence in my office. This describes Dunham-Soetoro-Obama-Soebarkah-X to a TEE!


He has no roots that are firmly planted or lead anywhere
Who is his daddy? I personally do not believe for even a minute it was Barack Senior. Some have suggested Frank Marshall Davis, renowned communist and mentor to young Barry. Based on looks alone I would say it has to be Malcom X.

Where was he born? Are his roots in Hawaii or Kenya? Perhaps they are in Indonesia or NY/Connecticut. Or maybe Canada or Washington state was the sight of this “historical” birth. Was he born in 1961 or 1959 or some other year? No one knows for sure as no infallible proof has been offered to absolutely verify his roots.

What is his name? Was he born Barry Dunham, acquiring the maiden name of his unwed mother? It is highly doubtful he was born as Barry Soetoro. Perhaps the official birth name was Bari Malik Shabazz? Again, no one really can say with confidence what his name was at any given point in time.


The few stems of his life are flexible and not stable or sustaining
His childhood appears to be one of world travel. Hawaii, Washington and possibly Kenya have been uncovered as places little Barry appeared prior to his first birthday.

Then there is another stem where he suddenly appears in Indonesia -- adopted by an Indonesian national, Lolo Soetoro -- where he attended a madrassa as the start of his formal education. Following the pattern, we have little knowledge of this stem, other than he studied islam [sic] and thinks the moslem [sic] call to prayer is the most beautiful sound on earth.

The next stem takes us to Hawaii where he allegedly attended Punahou School, the prestigious private academy in Honolulu, Hawaii. We know more of this stem than others since he appeared in a couple of their photos and yearbooks. If I remember correctly there were a few classmates who actually remembered him and spoke out about this illusive character.

For a real treat just try and discover the truth surrounding the stem of his college days. He allegedly attended Occidental College from fall 1979 through spring 1981. No records have been released, naturally. We have no clue if he attended as a foreign national as Barry Soetoro from Indonesia or Barack Obama, whoever that may be. We do know from Dr. John C. Drew that he actually attended Occidental and had a Pakistani roommate by the name of Mohammed Hasan Chandoo.

He allegedly attended and graduated from Columbia University, but there seems to be no real records of his attendance. It has been said he received an undergraduate degree from Columbia University in 1983. However, there appears to be a year missing from the two years needed to complete this degree. Was this missing year spent in Pakistan? We also know -- according to his own words in Chapter 6 of “Dreams from my Father” -- it was here in New York, about to begin classes at Columbia, that he began insisting on the name Barack. Did he legally change his name prior to moving to NY? He supposedly went to Columbia from the fall of 1981 to spring 1983. And grades? Your guess is as good as mine. Did he actually graduate? Yes, that is the story and everyone involved is sticking to it … never mind any form of proof.

The next very twisted stem leads us to Boston and Harvard Law School. He was allegedly at Harvard from late 1988 and got his Juris doctorate from Harvard Law School, where he allegedly graduated magna cum laude in 1991. He also became the president of the Harvard Law Review. How on earth that was accomplished with no writings or articles submitted is just another in a long line of questions. Again, we have no indication as to his grades or any extra-curricular activity, as would generally be pertinent in discerning the scholastic achievements of such a “famous” alumna.


The leaves of accomplishment
There are few and they are fragile, withering and falling off at the least bit of scrutiny.
Somewhere between Occidental and the trip to NY for the purpose of attending Columbia University, he apparently made a trip to Pakistan. Whether he made the trip with his roommate Chandoo, or simply stayed with Mohammed’s parents is unclear, like most everything else about his life story. Was he there simply as part of a little globetrotting or was he attending a terrorist training camp? There have also been questions raised in regards to how long he was in Pakistan. Was he there three weeks or a year?

Now for a bud, more so than a leaf, we are told he actually worked for a bit at the ripe old age of 22. Per Wikipedia: In the late summer of 1983, Obama interviewed for a job at Business International Corporation. He got the job and allegedly worked there for "little more than year"

In 1985, freshly graduated from Columbia University and working for a New York business consultant, the newly minted Barack Obama decided to become a community organizer. Although he didn't understand what the job involved, and his inquiries turned up few opportunities. Then miraculously he got a call from Jerry Kellman, an organizer working on Chicago's far South Side. Thus, a community organizer was born in Chicago. Until he became bored in 1988 and jetted off to Boston and Harvard.

In 1991, Obama accepted a two-year position as Visiting Law and Government Fellow at the University of Chicago Law School to work on his first book.
(Yeah, you read that right! He gets a book deal because he completed college and law school and spent 3 years rabble rousing in Chicago after a year stint at some alleged business.)
He was a Lecturer there from 1992 to 1996, and a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to2004, during which time he taught three courses per year.
(sure hope he didn’t strain himself with such a heavy load) Oh, and what did he do from 1991-92? Ohhhhh, he musta worked on his book!

In 1993 he joined the law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, where he was an associate for three years from 1993 to 1996, then of counsel from 1996 to 2004, with his law license becoming inactive in 2002.
(why did his license become “inactive”?)

He served three terms representing the 13th District in the Illinois Senate from 1997 to 2004. Not much to tell since most of his records disappeared or were sealed...something we have become all too familiar with.

Following a failed attempt to unseat the Democratic incumbent for a seat in the United States House of Representatives in 2000, Obama ran and won the race for the United States Senate in 2004. Most of his votes were simply “present” showing what a brilliant legislator he is.

Officially he began running for president in February 2007, after only serving 2 years in the US Senate. The rest, as they say, is history.

With his resume, I would not hire him as a pooper scooper for my dog.

The Dunham-Soetoro-Obama-Soebarkah-X Regime is about to uproot, exposing itself to the world that it is nothing but scum!

Obama Biased Indiana Elections Officials Vote to Put Obama on Ballot, Ignore Law and Fraud Evidence, Audio, First Hand Account

Biased Indiana Elections officials call objectors “birthers”, don’t address and matters of law and ignore evidence that Obama is using a social security number that was never assigned to him. When Obama started using this stolen SSN he was most likely an Indonesian citizen as State Department documents prove that he was known as Soebarkah.

... the connection to Obama’s fraudulent social security number, birth certificate from Hawaii, and mother’s record’s-it did not matter. We lost the challenge 4-0

And yet another one shot to hell. So far nothing has worked and yet more and more evidence comes to light proving the man is not who he says he is and has presented no valid papers to persuade otherwise.

When will the people rise up and demand justice? 

I AM A FREEKING GENIUS

2-16-12

It is difficult to wake up one day and realize that in spite of all odds you are the smartest person in the world. Over the past several years it has been my habit to fire up the computer and scan the headlines, while drinking my first pot of coffee, reading articles of interest. What I have found lately – especially within the past six months – is that there is no real news. Articles which hold any interest or real zest are hard to find and require searching many numbers of individual websites. No longer is it possible to go to the Drudge Report or FreeRepublic to see a conglomeration of the news for the day. In desperation I have actually reduced myself to checking Yahoo headlines.

Oh, there are plenty of keystrokes and bandwidth being utilized to be sure, but little of any real substance in regards to the latest outrage of the day. There are few hard hitting essays expressed by free-thinking authors who have duly researched their subject matter, who are also willing to have them published, unafraid of the consequences. It has become a Herculean task to find them, dancing from site to site, as you must also have at least a modicum of knowledge as to what sites actually allow truth – as opposed to pure propaganda – to be posted on their sites.

And so it is I have begun to find articles that at least skirt the real dilemmas we face as a nation today. However, they are constructed to be politically correct and hide the true meaning of much that is said. For instance; a myriad of words are used to replace the one word that would sum up in a neat package what many are trying to say… communism/communist would be one such word. Another would be Enemedia as opposed to mainstream media, as there is nothing mainstream about the dreck being spread by the enemies of America and the truth. My biggest pet peeve, however, is the use of the word “president” when referring to that illegal, ineligible, unconstitutional, prevaricating, traitorous SOB currently soiling the People’s House in Washington, DC. Usurper is the word to best describe that plight on America. It is beyond repulsive to me to see “it” being referred to as President of the United States of America…which he is not.

This finally brings me back to my sheer genius…my prescience if you will. More than 1121 days have passed since I ranted to anyone who would listen that we would be thrown into a Constitutional crisis of monumental proportions if we allowed that traitor to be installed into the Oval office. On numerous occasions I have stated that the installation of this no one from nowhere would be the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the people and the United States of America. As I vociferated in respect to the damage he would do to our country and our people many began to avoid me, thinking perhaps I had gone too far. Lo and behold, more than three years later, I am seeing others refer to his deliberate destruction of America reducing her and her citizens to little more than that of third world status.

The admonition to wake up and observe the destruction and continuing attacks on our country and culture has finally gone viral. My response has been one of cognitive dissonance. Having been tied up in knots for four years as I rode around the internet as Paul Revere warning the communists are coming, the communists are coming has left me a bit too exhausted to react with much more than snicker that the sheeple have finally taken note of what little more than a few of us have been screaming since this fraud arrived on the scene.

What is truly troublesome is that it has taken nearly four years for the alleged conservative, alternative media to begin sounding the alarms. This is absurd when one considers the bastard told us exactly what he intended to do, BEFORE he was ensconced in the White House. What was so difficult to understand when he said:

"I need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to your neighbors. I want you to talk to them whether they are independent or whether they are Republican. I want you to argue with them and get in their face." “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun”

"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you will join with me as we try to change it."

"We are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America"

"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems, I will not weaponize space... I will slow development of future combat systems I will institute a 'Defense Priorities Board' to ensure the quadrennial defense review is not used ..."

Now that it has become crystal clear, even to the self imposed deaf, dumb and blind among us, that he really did mean what he said, a few are beginning to get nervous.

Sadly, they are still not addressing the rudimentary cause of the situation. Steve Dunham / Barry Dunham / Bari Shabazz / Barry Soetoro / Barack Hussein Obama-Suebarkah-X or whoever and whatever he is, is NOT constitutionally eligible to serve as President of the United States of America. Therefore, he is NOT a legal president, consequently he needs to be removed NOW and everything he has done made null and void. Currently this may be done somewhat peacefully. If he is once again permitted to appear on the voting ballot later this year, with the massive amount of voter fraud now being admitted to, he will win and America will be pronounced dead. This is not hyperbole, but merely statement of fact.

Generally I am not prone to self-aggrandizing, but when it come to this fraud in the White House and what he has done -- and continues to do unabated – combined with the repercussions it has caused … I am indeed a freeking genius as one of the few who stated years ago most of the stances some are now adopting as we approach the hour of no return.

by Shell

COWARDS and the SPINELESS, GUTLESS POLTROONS who SUPPORT THEM

Frequently articles and comments appear in regard to defining the enemy – usually they condemn some individual or group for failing to recognize and define the prevailing enemy of the day. Generally speaking most of the times such articles and comments refer to our moslem [sic] enemies. However, I contend that there are a number of other enemies who most will also fail to define in clear and concise verbiage that all are able to read, understand and apply in their daily lives and understanding.

The number one enemy to which I refer is Barack Hussein Obama. To refer to this ineligible, unconstitutional usurping demagogue as ‘president’ is insulting to the vast majority of the American people and a false descriptor of one so vile. Unless and until he produces documentation providing proof positive he is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN of the United States of America, he is nothing more than a common street hustler and a fraud of monumental proportions. And spare me all the rhetoric about that forged CERTIFICATION of Live Birth, mommy was an American, he was born in Hawaii nonsense. Fact is IF Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was his daddy, as he claims; he is in no way a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN and is therefore ineligible to serve as President of the United States. A precursory glance of The Obama File will enlighten even the most staunch defender of the usurper if they read the information with an open mind and continue to research.

Call him whatever you like -- islamo-fascist, foreign born, communist bastard works -- just do not call him president. Barry does not act like a president, govern as one, nor is mentally capable of being a president of a free nation. This is enough said about this stigma on America. He must be removed as ineligible and erased from our history and the word president should never be used to allude to Barry Soetoro, or whatever his name is. This would not have been necessary but for the 535 poltroons in the United States CONgre$$.

Another forbidden word these days is communism, and/or communist. Every euphemism known to man is used to refrain from using those words in today's discourse. If one were a conspiracy theorist one might believe it is a communist plot to dull our senses and understanding of the term. Many words are used to replace the one simple word that all understand, Communism. One can call it Marxism, socialism, progressivism, leftism or liberalism, but few feel horror at any of these words. In fact, few know what it means to call someone a marxist. Nor do they understand what a marxist agenda represents. I say this with all confidence because I have actually conducted my own study over the past two plus years. I’ve queried hundreds of folks from 9-90 years old. School kids, college kids, high school graduates, those with some college and those with Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees and only one of them could articulate exactly what a “Marxist” or “Marxism” actually was and what it stood for. A few more seemed to know it referred to Karl Marx, but were not quite up to speed on exactly what Karl Marx represents.

If we are to survive as a nation, this absolutely must end NOW. We need to be communicating and educating our fellow citizens. Not all are ignorant, stupid or communists themselves. Many are simply over-worked, over-stressed and over-extended with trying to raise a family, make ends meet, keep up with their children and their activities and the like. I remember when I was in that position and would have been more than happy to have someone give me a brief, very brief, description of what was transpiring out there in the real world I did not have time for. Today, communism is that brief one word description. Telling a working mom that the leftists or liberals are taking over the country and turning it into a socialist or marxist utopia will have no quick or viable meaning to her. With extremely high unemployment rates, prices rising by the hour on food, gas and utilities nothing spells out that misery, despair, failure and loss of freedom like the single word -- communism.

Socialism no longer holds much concern among people these days. It has been so over-used and misapplied it is no longer seen as any kind of threat. After all, Canada, England and France are known socialist countries and they are not much different than we are. Not only that, our young people have been so indoctrinated within our illustrious halls of learning, they don’t find much wrong with communism either. We’ve been given doses of socialism for decades in this country, but few seem to notice or care. In 1959 it is alleged that Nikita Khrushchev, Premier of the Soviet Union said “We cannot expect Americans to jump from capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans doses of socialism until they suddenly awake to find out they have Communism." Whether Mr. Khrushchev actually said those exact words or not, they ring very true to those of us who grew up during the so-called cold war. America is no longer the country where I grew up. It is no longer the country where my children grew up – as one of them pointed out to me just last week.

Although I groused extensively as I stood by and helplessly watched what I deemed to be socialist programs and ideologies being turned into laws for the sole purpose of controlling the masses, there was little I could do at the time. My mother and father assured me the silent majority would prevail and organizations were being formed to confront what we saw in the eighties as a slide into socialism. There was no internet then so it was difficult to know and understand what was actually transpiring.

I was that working mom I mentioned earlier with no time or energy left to worry about politics and what was going on outside my job and home. The few times I jumped on issues and attended civil service and city hall meetings I was slapped down at every turn. How dare I question the masters was the attitude at the time and there was no one or organization to help. Eventually, I simply withdrew from the process all together and did not even bother to vote for nearly twenty years. Meanwhile, my mother and father continued to give copious amounts of money to a plethora of organizations that were to stop all this nonsense. Many are still around with little to show for their existence, in my opinion, but they still beg for money on a regular basis. After witnessing how many of the so-called conservative organizations prostituted themselves during the 2008 presidential campaign, I have cut them all off.

What America needs today is an informed electorate screaming from the roof-tops and the street corners what they know to be true – from their own research – and not mincing words in doing so. Talk to everyone everywhere you go.
You can be respectful without moderating your message. Use hard hitting words of truth not weak words of appeasement.

We have an ineligible, unconstitutional, USURPER currently soiling the People’s House
• He said he planned on “fundamentally transforming” the United States of America -- and he is
• He said he would provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless – and he is -- if you are a supporter
• He said "I will stand with the moslems should the political winds shift in an ugly direction" and he has without bothering to wait for those shifting winds.

The usurper and his regime are instituting communist programs via unconstitutional czars and unprecedented power and authority given to appointed department heads – and all with little to no objection from congress.
• He is continuing, or strengthening, the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto and the 45 Communist Goals as entered into the Congressional record in 1963.
• The tactics used by his regime are those espoused by Saul Alinsky in Rules for Radicals
[Do not miss the first paragraph under “The Ideology of Change” on page 11]

Using words to aptly describe the actual events taking place is not throwing civility and decorum to the wind – it is a frantic attempt to open the eyes of those who still want to see, but are blinded by all the kinder, gentler words bandied about by the cowards and spineless in an effort to confuse and manipulate us.
Please educate yourself on these issues and go out across the land and spread the word boldly and without fear!

COMMUNISM DOES NOT WORK

What a profound little paragraph that says it all:

"You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation."
"You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."

~~~~ Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931 ~~~

To illustrate:
An economics professor at a local college made the statement that he had never failed a single student before but had once failed an entire class.
That class had insisted that socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.

The professor then said, "OK, we will have an experiment in this class on socialism. All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade so no one would fail and no one would receive an A.

After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B.
The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy.

As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so they studied little.

The second test average was a D! No one was happy.
When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F.

The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else.

All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed.

It could not be any simpler!

Suddenly it is All About the Constitution

Having just finished reading my e-mails and my favorite conservative news sites, I must say I am more disgusted than ever…and that’s pretty daggone disgusted. So it is best that I come here to vent my anger and frustration than on someone else’s site where I could be attacked or booted off. No one comes here to read, so it is my safe place.

Frankly, the screaming about trampling, trashing, shredding, burning, and walking all over the Constitution has grown quite old and quite tiresome.

Every group -- from the Christian organizations, to the values groups, to the liberty and/or patriot dot coms, to the tax gangs, to those claiming to represent my rights, to all the so-called conservative groups, and those crazy libertarians, along with many of the new media organizations -- are up in arms and telling me I must fight.

Yes, I simply MUST call, fax, write and harass my congress critters and yours as well.
Why? Because they are trampling, trashing, shredding, burning, and walking all over the Constitution, that’s why. And if I could send a few bucks to help them fight the new atrocity of the day that would be swell.

Don’t get me wrong -- I completely agree that the Constitution has suffered all the adjectives they care to throw out into cyber-space to sensationalize their claims. In fact, I have contributed to many of them in the past. So what’s my problem?

Where the hell have they been for the past two years?!?!

Where were they in April of 2008 when John McCain was being subjected to cavity searches in order to prove he was a natural born citizen -- eligible to serve as President of the United States of America? Anyone that knows me realizes I loathe McCain. No, I really despise the puke. He falls third on my detestable meter -- directly under Obama/Soetoro and John Kerry. But I digress.

Why was McCain subjected to a Congressional interrogation and issued a Senate resolution declaring him a natural born citizen, but NOT ONE QUESTION was asked of the one person running for president who stated in his own autobiography, or whatever he called it, that he was a British subject at birth. WHY?!?!

As the drumbeat continued to get stronger and louder throughout the summer -- until August 2008 when the first lawsuit was filed questioning Obama/Soetoro’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president -- WHY were these groups not sending vast numbers of e-mails and snail mail urging us all to demand proof of his eligibility? Why were there no demands that the Senate…or the House…or the DNC…or the Secretaries of State certify this unknown apparition?

WHY???

The Court and Congress Expected the Other to Resolve the Obama Eligibility Question

"A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers" blog has an interesting analysis on the April 15, 2010 testimony before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the issue of the composition of the United States Supreme Court by Justice Clarence Thomas.

An excerpt from Mario Apuzzo, Esq. analysis:

Rep. Serrano did not like Justice Thomas blaming Congress for the mishandling of the matter so he shoots back at Justice Thomas by telling him the Court failed to answer the Obama eligibility question when it should have but now is answering the question of whether someone who is not born in the United States can sit on the U.S. Supreme Court. From this comment we can conclude that Congress did not believe that it was its job to answer the question of whether Obama is eligible to be President and expected the judicial branch of government to answer that question.

Frankly, I'm not sure I agree with Mr. Apuzzo's analysis. All that can be gained from my perspective would be that we will have a school yard type volly of "it's your fault" ... "no it's not, it's your fault" until the usurping poe currently soiling the People's House continues to dismantle the USA and make enemies of the rest of the world.

During the 2008 campaign when the first lawsuits began to be filed in August, all one could hear over the din was how the Constitution does not disqualify anyone from RUNNING for POTUS, but only from SERVING as POTUS. We were told he must first win the election before there would be standing to file a lawsuit.

When he was proclaimed the winner of the election in November we were told the election had not been certified by the electors, therefore he had not officially been declared POTUS, thus the “president-elect” title was used for the following 2.5 months. Consequently, there were no valid reasons to object to his election.

Electors met in December to select the president and vice president. The electors sign, seal and certify packages of electoral votes and immediately send one set of votes to the President of the Senate. However, we were told unless and until the electoral votes are certified by a joint session of CONgre$$ there is no official winner of the election.

In January electoral votes are counted and tabulated before a joint session of both houses of CONgre$$, after which it is officially declared who has been elected President and Vice President of the United States of America. It is here that objections may be raised by members. Out of 435 criminals, not one SINator nor one (non-)representative had the … ummm … ahhh … errr…GUTS to object or question the eligibility of the poe. Consequently, on January 8, 2009 the poe and his side-kick were “officially” declared elected. But…but…but…he hasn’t actually been sworn in yet, so it is not official and he is not yet SERVING as potus became the battle cry for the next delay.

Then on January 14th, obama/biden paid a visit to the supreme court. Considering there were cases in the pipeline challenging obama’s constitutional eligibility to SERVE as president, this little “visit” remains highly suspect, IMHO, and our fate was sealed.


January 20, 2009 the biggest fraud in the history of the world was perpetrated not only on the USA, but the world.
SO -- now the illegal, ineligible poe is the SERVING potus. Many lawsuits have been filed only to now be told they have no standing.

What the hell does that mean? No standing? I am an American citizen -- a natural born American citizen -- as well as a taxpayer. Why do I not have standing? How is it that ONE person has standing to get prayer removed from schools? ONE person has standing to all but abolish Christmas in our schools and public forums? ONE person has standing to challenge “In God We Trust” on our currency or “One nation under God” in our pledge of allegiance, but NO ONE seems to have standing to challenge the constitutionality of an unconstitutional, illegal, ineligible person residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. in Washington, D.C.?

And we sit here and bitch and regurgitate ad nauseam all the information we have had for two years while the poe systematically destroys the USA and every ally we have ever had, while bowing and scraping at the feet of our enemies.

I think I’ll just go back to bed and cover up my head. Perhaps tomorrow I’ll awake to a sane world once again.

Cesar Chavez Day

Presidential Proclamation - Cesar Chavez Day

A PROCLAMATION


The rights and benefits working Americans enjoy today were not easily gained; they had to be won. It took generations of courageous men and women, fighting to secure decent working conditions, organizing to demand fair pay, and sometimes risking their lives. Some, like Cesar Estrada Chavez, made it the cause of their lives. Today, on what would have been his 83rd birthday, we celebrate Cesar's legacy and the progress achieved by all who stood alongside him.

Raised by a family of migrant farm workers, Cesar Chavez spent his youth moving across the American Southwest, working in fields and vineyards, and experiencing firsthand the hardships he would later crusade to abolish. At the time, farm workers were deeply impoverished and frequently exploited, exposed to very hazardous working conditions, and often denied clean drinking water, toilets, and other basic necessities. The union Cesar later founded with Dolores Huerta, the United Farm Workers of America (UFW), still addresses these issues today.

After serving in the United States Navy, Cesar Chavez became a community organizer and began his lifelong campaign for civil rights and social justice. Applying the principles of nonviolence, he empowered countless laborers, building a movement that grew into the UFW. He led workers in marches, strikes, and boycotts, focusing our Nation's attention on their plight and using the power of picket lines to win union contracts.

"The love for justice that is in us is not only the best part of our being, but it is also the most true to our nature," Cesar Chavez once said. Since our Nation's earliest days of independence, we have struggled to perfect the ideals of equal justice and opportunity enshrined in our founding documents. As Cesar suggests, justice may be true to our nature, but as history teaches us, it will not prevail unless we defend its cause.

Few Americans have led this charge so tirelessly, and for so many, as Cesar Chavez. To this day, his rallying cry -- "Sí, se puede," or "Yes, we can," -- inspires hope and a spirit of possibility in people around the world. His movement strengthened our country, and his vision lives on in the organizers and social entrepreneurs who still empower their neighbors to improve their communities.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 31, 2010, as Cesar Chavez Day. I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate service, community, and education programs to honor Cesar Chavez's enduring legacy.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.


BARACK OBAMA

__________________________________________________________________

There simply are NO WORDS to express the disdain I hold toward this fraud who has inserted himself into the highest office in the land. His utter contempt for the United States of America, the American people and the foundation on which we were formed is stunning, to say the least.

Obama Criticism Flow Chart

As soon as I quit laughing I had to post this outstanding piece of work from Missourah.com







Yes, I know it is sad. It is pathetic. It is disgusting. It is a diversion.

However, THIS is where the DemonRATS want to focus our attention.
Bad for the country. But hey, they could care less about this country.

Is He Eligible?

Scenario 1:
Born in the USA (HI, WA, TX or whatever)

Mother is 18 -- Legal age in the US in 1961 was 21 y/o
In 1961 Hawaiian law stated must have lived in HI for 5 years after
the age of 16 (or 14 or 15 - I‘ve seen all)
Thus, unable to pass on citizenship if she is the only American citizen
parent

Father is a foreigner -- BO Sr. who was a Kenyan under British subjection
Senior is a British citizen
Citizenship is passed by the father in this case, which "Obama" admits

Mom and Dad may, or may not have been married, but it is irrelevant as Dad was already married so the “marriage” would not be legal in the USA

US Code: Title 8, Chapter12, Subchapter III, Part I, Section 1405: Persons born in HI

Conclusion:
No way is he a “natural born citizen” of the USA as that requires BOTH parents to be US citizens. He may or may not be a “native born citizen”
It also questions his US citizenship, but not according to Beckwith


Scenario 2:
Born in Kenya (or Canada or any foreign nation)

Mother is 18 -- Legal age in the US in 1961 was 21 y/o
In 1961 Hawaiian law stated must have lived in HI for 5 years after the age of 16 (or 14 or 15 - I‘ve seen all these ages)
Thus, unable to pass on citizenship if she is the only American citizen parent

Father is a Kenyan National -- see Scenario 1

Conclusion:
There is NO WAY he is a “natural born citizen” and may not even be a citizen unless he was naturalized at some point. There are no records to indicate he ever was.

Chart showing the classifications with sources


Scenario 3:
Born somewhere in the USA

Mother is an 18 y/o US citizen

Father is US citizen 18 or older -- Frank Marshall Davis, Malcom X or whoever

Conclusion:
The baby would definitely be a “natural born citizen”
However, his name would not be Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.
Therefore, while eligible to be POTUS, he is none the less a FRAUD, unless he legally changed his name to Barack Hussein Obama and there is no evidence to support said name change.


Scenario 4:
Mother is 18 y/o US citizen

Father is Kenyan National

Parents may or may not have been married
The minor child is adopted by Indonesian citizen, Lolo Soetoro
The child is known as Barry Soetoro as school records from Indonesia indicate

Conclusion:
Per the Obama File:
Upon reaching the age of 18, the minor can go before the appropriate US State Dept Official and apply for re-instatement of citizenship, and swear allegiance to the US.
There is no evidence that Obama has done so, and even if he did, he would then be a NATURALIZED citizen and will forever have lost any natural born citizen status to be president.


Other Concerns:
There is also the question of his legal name.
I have seen reports that his name was Barry Dunham and Barry Soetoro.
We know that he went by Barry Soetoro for at least some portion of his life.
When did he go from being Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama?
If there was no legal name change, would this not make anything and everything he has signed as Barack Obama fraudulent?

In all likelihood he is most definitely not constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States of America.
In all likelihood he is also the most fraudulent individual to ever attempt such a feat.