Shellings from the Peanut Gallery

There are times when one can no longer remain confined.
It matters not that one agrees or disagrees.
It matters only that the shell that binds be cracked and thrown off.

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

SoD PANETTA TELLS CONGRESS -- F**K YOU!


Senator:  But before we do this you would seek permission of the international “authorities”…

Traitor:  If we’re working with an international coalition and we’re working with NATO we would wanna be able to get appropriate permissions in order to be able to do that that’s, that’s something that all of these countries would wanna have so some kind of legal basis on which to act.

Senator:  What legal basis are you looking for?  What entity?

Traitor:  Well, obviously, if NATO made the decision to go in that would be one. If we developed an international coalition beyond NATO then obviously some kind of UN security resolution would….

Senator:  So you’re saying NATO would give you a legal basis and an ad hoc coalition of nations would provide a legal basis?

Traitor:  If we, I,if, if we were able to put together a coalition and were able to move together then obviously we would seek whatever legal basis we would need in  order to make that justified.   We can’t just pull them all together in a combat operation w/out getting the legal basis on which to act.

Senator:  Who are you asking for the legal basis from?

Traitor:  If it’s a … obviously if the UN passed a security resolution as it did in Libya we would do that.  If NATO came together as we did in Bosnia we would rely on that.  So, we have options here if we want to build the kind of international approach to dealing with the situation.

Senator:  I’m all for having international support, but I, I’m really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a LEGAL basis for the US MILITARY to be deployed in combat. 
I don’t believe it’s close to being correct.  They provide NO legal authority. 
The only legal authority that’s required to
deploy the US military is the congress
and the president and the constitution.

Traitor:  Let me just for the record be clear again, senator, so there’s no misunderstanding…
when it comes to the national defense of this country potus has the authority under the Constitution  to act to defend this country, and we will.  When it comes to an operation where we are trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in and operate as we did in Libya or Bosnia for that matter Afghanistan we wanna do it with permissions either by NATO or the international community.

Watch the entire exchange here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zNwOeyuG84&feature=colike

Well Senator, I’m not quite sure why you are baffled.  You and your treasonous cohorts have sat back and allowed the ineligible treasonous usurper to do whatever he damn well pleased for three years now.  Ye reap what you sow.  Thanks for nothing!

In essence Panetta sais: We will go to Syria and bomb them into submission if we want to and we don't need anything from the Congress to do so. We will "go in and operate as we did in Libya or Bosnia for that matter Afghanistan..."

Action against Afghanistan had the written approval of Congress in the form of the Authorization for Use of Military Force, Public Law 107-40 [S. J. RES. 23] you ignorant moron!
535 member in both Houses of Congress voted on Afghanistan.  There was ONE [1] NAY vote and 12 who chose not to vote at all. 

Oh how I loathe this regime!!!



This public law, 107-40 [S. J. RES. 23], was passed by Congress on September 14, 2001 and signed by President George W. Bush on September 18, 2001. The law authorized U.S. armed forces to use "all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001".
http://news.findlaw.com/wp/docs/terrorism/sjres23.es.html


Bottom of FormHhm


Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 08, 2011

COWARDS and the SPINELESS, GUTLESS POLTROONS who SUPPORT THEM

Frequently articles and comments appear in regard to defining the enemy – usually they condemn some individual or group for failing to recognize and define the prevailing enemy of the day. Generally speaking most of the times such articles and comments refer to our moslem [sic] enemies. However, I contend that there are a number of other enemies who most will also fail to define in clear and concise verbiage that all are able to read, understand and apply in their daily lives and understanding.

The number one enemy to which I refer is Barack Hussein Obama. To refer to this ineligible, unconstitutional usurping demagogue as ‘president’ is insulting to the vast majority of the American people and a false descriptor of one so vile. Unless and until he produces documentation providing proof positive he is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN of the United States of America, he is nothing more than a common street hustler and a fraud of monumental proportions. And spare me all the rhetoric about that forged CERTIFICATION of Live Birth, mommy was an American, he was born in Hawaii nonsense. Fact is IF Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was his daddy, as he claims; he is in no way a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN and is therefore ineligible to serve as President of the United States. A precursory glance of The Obama File will enlighten even the most staunch defender of the usurper if they read the information with an open mind and continue to research.

Call him whatever you like -- islamo-fascist, foreign born, communist bastard works -- just do not call him president. Barry does not act like a president, govern as one, nor is mentally capable of being a president of a free nation. This is enough said about this stigma on America. He must be removed as ineligible and erased from our history and the word president should never be used to allude to Barry Soetoro, or whatever his name is. This would not have been necessary but for the 535 poltroons in the United States CONgre$$.

Another forbidden word these days is communism, and/or communist. Every euphemism known to man is used to refrain from using those words in today's discourse. If one were a conspiracy theorist one might believe it is a communist plot to dull our senses and understanding of the term. Many words are used to replace the one simple word that all understand, Communism. One can call it Marxism, socialism, progressivism, leftism or liberalism, but few feel horror at any of these words. In fact, few know what it means to call someone a marxist. Nor do they understand what a marxist agenda represents. I say this with all confidence because I have actually conducted my own study over the past two plus years. I’ve queried hundreds of folks from 9-90 years old. School kids, college kids, high school graduates, those with some college and those with Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees and only one of them could articulate exactly what a “Marxist” or “Marxism” actually was and what it stood for. A few more seemed to know it referred to Karl Marx, but were not quite up to speed on exactly what Karl Marx represents.

If we are to survive as a nation, this absolutely must end NOW. We need to be communicating and educating our fellow citizens. Not all are ignorant, stupid or communists themselves. Many are simply over-worked, over-stressed and over-extended with trying to raise a family, make ends meet, keep up with their children and their activities and the like. I remember when I was in that position and would have been more than happy to have someone give me a brief, very brief, description of what was transpiring out there in the real world I did not have time for. Today, communism is that brief one word description. Telling a working mom that the leftists or liberals are taking over the country and turning it into a socialist or marxist utopia will have no quick or viable meaning to her. With extremely high unemployment rates, prices rising by the hour on food, gas and utilities nothing spells out that misery, despair, failure and loss of freedom like the single word -- communism.

Socialism no longer holds much concern among people these days. It has been so over-used and misapplied it is no longer seen as any kind of threat. After all, Canada, England and France are known socialist countries and they are not much different than we are. Not only that, our young people have been so indoctrinated within our illustrious halls of learning, they don’t find much wrong with communism either. We’ve been given doses of socialism for decades in this country, but few seem to notice or care. In 1959 it is alleged that Nikita Khrushchev, Premier of the Soviet Union said “We cannot expect Americans to jump from capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans doses of socialism until they suddenly awake to find out they have Communism." Whether Mr. Khrushchev actually said those exact words or not, they ring very true to those of us who grew up during the so-called cold war. America is no longer the country where I grew up. It is no longer the country where my children grew up – as one of them pointed out to me just last week.

Although I groused extensively as I stood by and helplessly watched what I deemed to be socialist programs and ideologies being turned into laws for the sole purpose of controlling the masses, there was little I could do at the time. My mother and father assured me the silent majority would prevail and organizations were being formed to confront what we saw in the eighties as a slide into socialism. There was no internet then so it was difficult to know and understand what was actually transpiring.

I was that working mom I mentioned earlier with no time or energy left to worry about politics and what was going on outside my job and home. The few times I jumped on issues and attended civil service and city hall meetings I was slapped down at every turn. How dare I question the masters was the attitude at the time and there was no one or organization to help. Eventually, I simply withdrew from the process all together and did not even bother to vote for nearly twenty years. Meanwhile, my mother and father continued to give copious amounts of money to a plethora of organizations that were to stop all this nonsense. Many are still around with little to show for their existence, in my opinion, but they still beg for money on a regular basis. After witnessing how many of the so-called conservative organizations prostituted themselves during the 2008 presidential campaign, I have cut them all off.

What America needs today is an informed electorate screaming from the roof-tops and the street corners what they know to be true – from their own research – and not mincing words in doing so. Talk to everyone everywhere you go.
You can be respectful without moderating your message. Use hard hitting words of truth not weak words of appeasement.

We have an ineligible, unconstitutional, USURPER currently soiling the People’s House
• He said he planned on “fundamentally transforming” the United States of America -- and he is
• He said he would provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless – and he is -- if you are a supporter
• He said "I will stand with the moslems should the political winds shift in an ugly direction" and he has without bothering to wait for those shifting winds.

The usurper and his regime are instituting communist programs via unconstitutional czars and unprecedented power and authority given to appointed department heads – and all with little to no objection from congress.
• He is continuing, or strengthening, the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto and the 45 Communist Goals as entered into the Congressional record in 1963.
• The tactics used by his regime are those espoused by Saul Alinsky in Rules for Radicals
[Do not miss the first paragraph under “The Ideology of Change” on page 11]

Using words to aptly describe the actual events taking place is not throwing civility and decorum to the wind – it is a frantic attempt to open the eyes of those who still want to see, but are blinded by all the kinder, gentler words bandied about by the cowards and spineless in an effort to confuse and manipulate us.
Please educate yourself on these issues and go out across the land and spread the word boldly and without fear!

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Suddenly it is All About the Constitution

Having just finished reading my e-mails and my favorite conservative news sites, I must say I am more disgusted than ever…and that’s pretty daggone disgusted. So it is best that I come here to vent my anger and frustration than on someone else’s site where I could be attacked or booted off. No one comes here to read, so it is my safe place.

Frankly, the screaming about trampling, trashing, shredding, burning, and walking all over the Constitution has grown quite old and quite tiresome.

Every group -- from the Christian organizations, to the values groups, to the liberty and/or patriot dot coms, to the tax gangs, to those claiming to represent my rights, to all the so-called conservative groups, and those crazy libertarians, along with many of the new media organizations -- are up in arms and telling me I must fight.

Yes, I simply MUST call, fax, write and harass my congress critters and yours as well.
Why? Because they are trampling, trashing, shredding, burning, and walking all over the Constitution, that’s why. And if I could send a few bucks to help them fight the new atrocity of the day that would be swell.

Don’t get me wrong -- I completely agree that the Constitution has suffered all the adjectives they care to throw out into cyber-space to sensationalize their claims. In fact, I have contributed to many of them in the past. So what’s my problem?

Where the hell have they been for the past two years?!?!

Where were they in April of 2008 when John McCain was being subjected to cavity searches in order to prove he was a natural born citizen -- eligible to serve as President of the United States of America? Anyone that knows me realizes I loathe McCain. No, I really despise the puke. He falls third on my detestable meter -- directly under Obama/Soetoro and John Kerry. But I digress.

Why was McCain subjected to a Congressional interrogation and issued a Senate resolution declaring him a natural born citizen, but NOT ONE QUESTION was asked of the one person running for president who stated in his own autobiography, or whatever he called it, that he was a British subject at birth. WHY?!?!

As the drumbeat continued to get stronger and louder throughout the summer -- until August 2008 when the first lawsuit was filed questioning Obama/Soetoro’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president -- WHY were these groups not sending vast numbers of e-mails and snail mail urging us all to demand proof of his eligibility? Why were there no demands that the Senate…or the House…or the DNC…or the Secretaries of State certify this unknown apparition?

WHY???

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, April 18, 2010

The Court and Congress Expected the Other to Resolve the
Obama Eligibility Question

"A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers" blog has an interesting analysis on the April 15, 2010 testimony before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the issue of the composition of the United States Supreme Court by Justice Clarence Thomas.

An excerpt from Mario Apuzzo, Esq. analysis:
Rep. Serrano did not like Justice Thomas blaming Congress for the mishandling of the matter so he shoots back at Justice Thomas by telling him the Court failed to answer the Obama eligibility question when it should have but now is answering the question of whether someone who is not born in the United States can sit on the U.S. Supreme Court. From this comment we can conclude that Congress did not believe that it was its job to answer the question of whether Obama is eligible to be President and expected the judicial branch of government to answer that question.

Frankly, I'm not sure I agree with Mr. Apuzzo's analysis. All that can be gained from my perspective would be that we will have a school yard type volly of "it's your fault" ... "no it's not, it's your fault" until the usurping poe currently soiling the People's House continues to dismantle the USA and make enemies of the rest of the world.

During the 2008 campaign when the first lawsuits began to be filed in August, all one could hear over the din was how the Constitution does not disqualify anyone from RUNNING for POTUS, but only from SERVING as POTUS. We were told he must first win the election before there would be standing to file a lawsuit.

When he was proclaimed the winner of the election in November we were told the election had not been certified by the electors, therefore he had not officially been declared POTUS, thus the “president-elect” title was used for the following 2.5 months. Consequently, there were no valid reasons to object to his election.

Electors met in December to select the president and vice president. The electors sign, seal and certify packages of electoral votes and immediately send one set of votes to the President of the Senate. However, we were told unless and until the electoral votes are certified by a joint session of CONgre$$ there is no official winner of the election.

In January electoral votes are counted and tabulated before a joint session of both houses of CONgre$$, after which it is officially declared who has been elected President and Vice President of the United States of America. It is here that objections may be raised by members. Out of 435 criminals, not one SINator nor one (non-)representative had the … ummm … ahhh … errr…GUTS to object or question the eligibility of the poe. Consequently, on January 8, 2009 the poe and his side-kick were “officially” declared elected. But…but…but…he hasn’t actually been sworn in yet, so it is not official and he is not yet SERVING as potus became the battle cry for the next delay.

Then on January 14th, obama/biden paid a visit to the supreme court. Considering there were cases in the pipeline challenging obama’s constitutional eligibility to SERVE as president, this little “visit” remains highly suspect, IMHO, and our fate was sealed.

Photobucket

January 20, 2009 the biggest fraud in the history of the world was perpetrated not only on the USA, but the world.
SO -- now the illegal, ineligible poe is the SERVING potus. Many lawsuits have been filed only to now be told they have no standing.

What the hell does that mean? No standing? I am an American citizen -- a natural born American citizen -- as well as a taxpayer. Why do I not have standing? How is it that ONE person has standing to get prayer removed from schools? ONE person has standing to all but abolish Christmas in our schools and public forums? ONE person has standing to challenge “In God We Trust” on our currency or “One nation under God” in our pledge of allegiance, but NO ONE seems to have standing to challenge the constitutionality of an unconstitutional, illegal, ineligible person residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. in Washington, D.C.?

And we sit here and bitch and regurgitate ad nauseam all the information we have had for two years while the poe systematically destroys the USA and every ally we have ever had, while bowing and scraping at the feet of our enemies.

I think I’ll just go back to bed and cover up my head. Perhaps tomorrow I’ll awake to a sane world once again.


Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, September 20, 2009


The Truth About Barack’s Birth Certificate


There are liars, damn liars and lying liars that lie! This would describe Obama's "Fight the Smears" website. What a joke!

This came directly from said website:

Smears claiming Barack Obama doesn’t have a birth certificate aren’t actually about that piece of paper — they’re about manipulating people into thinking Barack is not an American citizen.

NO asshole -- it most definitely IS about that piece of paper. You idiots are the folks that are manipulating people with your lies and massaging the verbiage. Very few -- that I am aware of -- have questioned whether Obama is an American citizen as it is quite irrelevant to what most care about.

The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.
The truth is, you have shown NO EVIDENCE of that which you claim is truth.
Uhh uhh, I believe you, now SHOW ME THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE!

He may or may not have been born in Hawaii. He may or may not be a native citizen, which is all he could possibly be if his daddy is truely BHO, Sr. Being a native citizen is not a constitutionally acceptable status to serve as POTUS.

FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship -- [FactCheck??? ROTFLMAO!]

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

1. Anyone believing one word FactCheck has to say in regard to obama is a fool. FactCheck is a subsidiary of the Annenberg Foundation, for whom obama worked and served on their board.

2. You admit right here that IF he is indeed Barack Obama, Jr. he was a British subject and Kenyan citizen at birth, thus not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

3. Renouncing citizenship or having citizenship to a foreign nation expire rules has nothing to do with being a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

4. One point you left out was his adoption by Indonesian citizen, Lolo Soetoro. How does that fit into this puzzle?


"What you won't hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics
that uses religion as a wedge, and patriotism as a bludgeon -- that sees our
opponents not as competitors to challenge, but enemies to demonize."
Barack Obama, June 3, 2008

You sir, are a liar.



Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,